Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Digora ¿¡¼­ ³ëÃâ½Ã°£ÀÇ º¯È­°¡ ±Ù°üÄ¡·á¿ë fileÀÇ Ã·ºÎ½Äº°¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ

The effects of various exposure times in the detectability on the tips of the endodontic files in Digora

Ä¡°ú¹æ»ç¼± 1997³â 27±Ç 1È£ p.55 ~ 71
°íÁö¿µ, ±èÁÖÈÖ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
°íÁö¿µ (  ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ º´¸®Çб³½Ç
±èÁÖÈÖ (  ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°ú¹æ»ç¼±ÇÐ

Abstract

Image Plate(IP)¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ±¸³» µðÁöÅ» ¿µ»ó¹ýÀÎ Digora ½Ã½ºÅÛÀº ³ëÃâ½Ã
°£ÀÇ È°¿ë¹üÀ§°¡ ³Ð¾î, ȯÀÚÀÇ ³ëÃâ·®À» ÁÙÀÏ ¼ö ÀÖÀ¸¸ç,»óÀÇ Á¶ÀÛÀ» ÅëÇÏ¿© Áø´Ü´É·ÂÀ» »ó
½Â½Ãų »Ó ¾Æ´Ï¶ó, »óÀÇ Àü¼ÛÀ̳ª, ÀúÀåÀÌ °¡´ÉÇÏ´Ù.
ÀÌ¿¡ ÀúÀÚ´Â Digora ½Ã½ºÅÛ¿¡¼­ ½Ã°£ÀÇ º¯È­°¡ ±Ù°üÄ¡·á¿ë file ÷ºÎ ½Äº°
¿¡ ¹ÌÄ£ ¿µÇâÀ» Æò°¡Çϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© ´ÙÀ½°ú °°ÀÌ ½ÇÇèÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¹ß°ÅµÈ 45°³ÀÇ ¼Ò±¸Ä¡ÀÇ ±Ù°ü¿¡
10¹ø, 15¹ø, 20¹ø K-fileÀ» Ä¡±Ù´ÜºÎ¿¡ ±Ù°ü°øÀ» ³ÑÁö ¾Ê´Â ¹üÀ§¿¡¼­ ¹«ÀÛÀ§·Î °¢°¢ À§Ä¡½Ã
Ų µÚ¿¡ ·¹Áø-¼®°í ºí·Ï¿¡ °¢°¢ÀÇ Ä¡¾Æ¸¦ ¸Å½ÄÇÏ¿© 0.01ÃÊ, 0.03ÃÊ, 0.06ÃÊ, 0.12ÃÊ, 0.25ÃÊÀÇ
5´Ü°èÀÇ ³ëÃâ½Ã°£ÀÇ º¯È­ ÇÏ¿¡ µ¿ÀÏÇÑ °íÁ¤ À§Ä¡¿¡¼­ ÃÔ¿µµÈ E-plus Çʸ§°ú Digora
½Ã½ºÅÛÀÇ ¸ð´ÏÅÍ¿¡¼­ ³ªÅ¸³­ file ±æÀ̸¦ 4¸íÀÇ °üÂûÀÚ°¡ ÃøÁ¤ÇÑ µÚ Æò±Õ ¿ÀÂ÷(Ãø
Á¤µÈ file °ª°ú ½ÇÁ¦ file °ªÀÇ Â÷µéÀÇ Æò±Õ)¸¦ ±¸ÇÏ¿© ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº °á°ú¸¦ ¾ò¾ú´Ù.
1. Digora ½Ã½ºÅÛ°ú E-plus Çʸ§ÀÇ Æò±Õ ¿ÀÂ÷¸¦ ºñ±³ÇÑ °á°ú, 0.01ÃÊÀÇ ³ë
Ãâ½Ã°£¿¡¼­ E-plus Çʸ§ÀÇ Æò±Õ ¿ÀÂ÷°¡ °¢ file±º¿¡ µû¶ó-4.453 mm, -4.497 mm, -3.857
mm·Î ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸¸ç, Digora ½Ã½ºÅÛÀº 0.065 mm,0.607 mm, 0.719 mm·Î ³ªÅ¸
³ª Åë°èÇÐÀûÀÎ À¯ÀÇÂ÷°¡ ÀÖ¾ú´Ù(p<0.05).
2. Digora ½Ã½ºÅÛ ³»¿¡¼­ ³ëÃâ½Ã°£¿¡ µû¸¥ Æò±Õ ¿ÀÂ÷¸¦ ºñ±³ÇÑ °á°ú, 10¹ø
file±º¿¡¼­ 0.01ÃÊÀÇ Æò±Õ ¿ÀÂ÷°¡ 0.12ÃÊ¿Í 0.25ÃÊ¿¡ ºñÇÏ¿© Åë°èÇÐÀûÀ¸·Î À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô ³·¾Ò°í
Ç¥ÁØÆíÂ÷´Â 0.729·Î Á¦ÀÏ Å©°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù(p<0.0.05).
3. Digora ½Ã½ºÅÛ ³»ÀÇ °¢ ³ëÃâ½Ã°£¿¡ µû¸¥ Æò±Õ ¿ÀÂ÷¿Í E-plusÇʸ§ÀÇ
0.25ÃÊÀÇ Æò±Õ ¿ÀÂ÷¸¦ ºñ±³ÇÑ °á°ú, Digora ½Ã½ºÅÛÀÇ 10¹ø file±º°ú 20¹ø file
±ºÀÇ 0.25ÃÊÀÇ Æò±Õ ¿ÀÂ÷¿Í E-Plus Çʸ§ÀÇ 0.25ÃÊÀÇ Æò±Õ ¿ÀÂ÷°£ÀÇ Åë°èÇÐÀûÀÎ À¯ÀÇÂ÷¸¦ º¸
¿´´Ù(p<0.05).
4. E-plusÇʸ§ ³»¿¡¼­ 0.25ÃÊÀÇ Æò±Õ ¿ÀÂ÷¿Í ´Ù¸¥ ³ëÃâ½Ã°£´ëÀÇ Æò±Õ ¿ÀÂ÷¸¦ ºñ±³ÇÑ °á°ú,
10¹ø file±ºÀº 0.01ÃÊ, 0.03ÃÊ¿¡¼­, 15¹ø°ú 20¹ø file±ºÀº 0.01ÃÊ¿¡¼­ Åë°èÇÐÀûÀÎ À¯ÀÇÂ÷¸¦ º¸¿´
´Ù(p<0.05).
°á·ÐÀûÀ¸·Î, Digora ½Ã½ºÅÛÀº E-plus Çʸ§¿¡ ºñÇÏ¿© ¸ðµç file±º¿¡¼­ 0.01
ÃÊÀÇ ÂªÀº ³ëÃâ½Ã°£¿¡¼­ fileÀÇ Ã»ºÎ ½Äº° ´É·ÂÀÌ ¿ì¼öÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, 15¹ø°ú 20¹ø fileÀ» »ç¿ëÇÒ
°æ ¿ì, E-plus 0.25ÃÊÀÇ 4%ÀÎ 0.01ÃʱîÁö ³ëÃâ½Ã°£À» ÁÙÀÏ ¼ö ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀ¸·Î »ç·áµÈ´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
Digora - an intraoral digital radiography system utilizing image plate
(IP) - has a dynamic range of exposure time which allows it to decrease the patient's
exposure time and to increase diagnostic ability through image processing, transmission
and storage.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the Digora system by
assessing the effects of various exposure times on the detectability on the tip of the
endodontic file. Examining the root canals o( 45 exoacted sound premolars, K-files No.
10, 15, and 20 were placed at slightly varying distances from the apex. The teeth were
glued onto resin-plaster blocks. Five exposure times varying between 0.01 seconds and
0.25 seconds were used. Four observers were asked to measure the distance between
the tip of the file and a reduction of crown portion, and obtained mean errors
(subtracting true file length from the measured file length), comparing Digora
monitors with E-plus films, which were both obtained under the same
geometrical positions.
The results were as follows
1. Comparing E-Plus film with Digora at 0.01 seconds, the mean errors
in E-plus film showed -4.453 §® -4.497 §® and -3.857 §® while the mean errors in
Digora showed 0.065 §® 0.607 §® and 0.719 §® according to the file
groups. Therefore there was a significant difference between E-plus film and
Digora (p<0.05).
2. By comparison of mean errors according to the various exposure times in the
Digora system the mean error at 0.01 seconds was significantly lower
than that at 0.12 and 0.25 seconds in the No. 10 file group(p<0.05). And the standard
deviation was the highest at 0.01 seconds.
3. Comparing E-plus film at 0.25 seconds with the Digora the mean
errors showed a significant difference between E-plus film at 0.25 seconds and the
Digora system at 0.25 seconds in No. 10 and 20 fie groups(p<0.05).
4. Comparing E-plus (Am at 0.25 seconds with other exposure times, the mean errors
showed a significant difference between E-plus film at 0.25 seconds and E-plus film at
0..01 and 0.03 seconds in 10 fine group(p<0.05). In the NO. 15 and 20 file groups, there
was a significant difference between E-plus film at 0.25 seconds and E-plus film at 0.01
seconds(P<0.05).
In conclusion, Digora was better than E-plus film in detectability on
the tip of the file at the exposure time of 0.01 seconds in all file groups. And we
concluded that Digora can shorten exposure times up to 4% of 0.25
seconds (0.01 sec), which is adequate exposure time for premolar in I-plus film using
No. 15 and 20 files.

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸